Australian R18+ classification talks canned

In Australia, we have a little problem with video game censorship. Any games that aren’t suitable for people over the age of 18 can’t be released in the country, which is a bit odd considering the average age of the Australian gamer is 30. The good news is that a solution is simple, by introducing an R18+ classification Australian adults will be able to play video games designed for them, a privelage most of the world currently enjoy.

The ball is rolling and it seems work is being done to fill this hole in Australian classification law – but like everything political there is a process that must be followed. I’m sure there is much more to it, but for simplicities sake I’ll condense it to this – the state and territory Attorney Generals must get together, create a pros and cons list (read: discussion paper) and vote unanimously in favour of introducing an R18 classification rating for video games.

Don’t worry that the Attorney Generals are ill-informed and believe the same rubbish that others may spew, before they make such a decision they look deeply into research, statistics and whatever else can assist them in making an accurate and correct decision for all Australians. In addition to this, members of the Australian public will be invited to comment on the issue giving the Attorney Generals some live feedback on what is going on in our hearts and minds, and with the Interactive Australia 2009 report containing survey data showing that a majority of Australian’s (91%, in fact) are in favour of an R18+ classification for games –  it’s beginning to look like this slow, long winded process may soon come to an end.

The bad news is that the process required to correct this problem is itself a little flawed, and can be manipulated in some rather alarming ways. 

Enter Michael Atkinson, Attorney General for South Australia.

I mentioned earlier that the process involves a unanimous vote, and unfortunately Atkinson is responsible for previous failings on this requirement – I guess we’re just lucky that Mr Atkinson was not in power when rock music or comic books came into popularity.  Atkinson’s argument against an R18+ classification rating is that it will allow more adult content onto store shelves and in his opinion Australian parents don’t have the time or intellegence to monitor or control what their children purchase or play.

I also mentioned that the process is flawed and open to manipulation – a point Michael Atkinson has happily illustrated today.

By removing his support for the discussion paper and public consoltation, Atkins has effectively stopped any effort to introduce an R18+ video game classification.

Obviously afraid to face his peers and the overwhelming research that both favors the introduction of an R18+ classification and deflates his personal beliefs on the topic, Atkins has “censored the debate on censorship”. 

It astounds me that this backward man is capable of holting progress on what really is a black and white issue, and it’s incredible to think he’d be so blatant in this regard. This really is disapointing, especially considering how on board and in touch with the Australian public the other Attorney Generals have been.


7 Responses to “Australian R18+ classification talks canned”

  1. 2 Jackie
    November 2, 2008 at 8:41 PM

    I knew you before you were famous… and i totally agree with your opinion.. i blame KRudd..

  2. November 3, 2008 at 8:38 AM

    Well I’d hardly say I’m famous, and unfortunately this is something we can’t blame entirely on Krudd – and considering his favor to forced internet censorship, I doubt his involvement would help progress the issue.

  3. November 4, 2008 at 6:21 PM

    Oh my, now this has been quite eye opening. Keep buying those games and putting money back into our economy. I play COD4 when I get time. Add me

  4. November 6, 2008 at 10:04 AM

    Well that’s another issue created by this; if a game gets banned here in Australia and gamers want to play it, they’ll import it. It’s cheaper, bypasses this stupidity and takes that money away from Australia. It also forces otherwise innocent people to break customs laws.

  5. November 8, 2008 at 9:57 AM

    This guy must be mentally handicapped himself

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Playing on Playstation 3

Red Dead Revolver - I paid about $1000 for my launch model PS3, so I guess it's time I get some use out of that emotion chip crammed inside. I remember Red Dead Revolver looking rather good when it was released, and despite the low resolution and odd blurring (that I attribute to playing on a HD set) the game holds up well. It looks good despite these graphical limitations because the art direction is so precise and awesome. And it isn't just the art direction, the music, dialogue and set design (for some reason, set seems a more fitting word than level) all work in tandem to recreate an iconic Wild West atmosphere. Red Dead Revolver doesn’t aim to recreate life in the Wild West, it allows our imagination to take over and populates the locale with legendary men and their legendary stories.

Playing on iPhone

edge - Well I never thought I'd consider playing a game on iPhone as actually gaming, but edge has turned me around. The game is built for the iPhone. Sure, it could be ported, but the elegance of what has been created is astounding, it boggles the mind and makes me wonder what amazing gems we'd receive if current gen consoles weren't clones of eachother.

Playing on PC

Sins of a Solar Empire, Demigod, Generals - Zero Hour - It may be a temporary effect as I slowly reintroduce the PC into my gaming diet, but it seems every title I’m excited to play on the platform is either a strategy game, or a cheap indie game. PC gaming isn’t dead, it’s just restricted to titles that require complex input or a pointing device, and games that couldn't be developed or distributed on other platforms. I guess that’s part of the reason the AppStore is so far a success, there were a lot of indie devs stuck on PC for lack of a better alternative.


October 2008
« Sep   Nov »

%d bloggers like this: